Graphics and Storage Performance

Moving in to graphics functioning, and over again for the near role we're seeing relatively modest performance improvements from the Exynos 8895 to the S9's Exynos 9810.

In the GFXBench Manhattan three.1 test, nosotros're looking at an 8 percent performance improvement in favor of the Exynos 9810 in the offscreen test, and xiv pct in the on-screen test. However the Exynos 9810 does manage to outperform the Snapdragon 835 with its Adreon 540 to the tune of 22 percent in the off-screen workload.

It's not as skillful news for the Exynos 9810 in 3DMark's Sling Shot benchmark. In the standard Sling Shot Unlimited test, the Exynos 9810 is slightly slower than the Exynos 8895 in the overall score, and a sizeable xix per centum behind the Snapdragon 835. The competition does even up in Sling Shot Farthermost Unlimited: the 9810 is 4% backside the Snapdragon 835 and 5% alee of the Exynos 8895.

The concluding graphics benchmark we're looking at is the Basemark U-Boat test, which has heavily favoured Mali GPUs in the past. Here, the Exynos 9810 in the Galaxy S9+ is xiv percent faster than the Exynos 8895, assuasive it to have a massive operation atomic number 82 over the Snapdragon 835. This is i of the few crushing victories for the Exynos 9810 relative to the last-gen Snapdragon 835.

While the Exynos 9810 is competitive against the Snapdragon 835 in graphics workloads and beats information technology in the instance of GFXBench and Basemark, the SoC does throttle heavily in the Galaxy S9+'s chassis. After 25 minutes of consecutive GFXBench 3.ane runs, the Exynos 9810 throttled by 42 percent, leading to a score reduction that actually placed it slower than the Pixel ii XL in long term graphics workloads. The Pixel 2 Forty and its Snapdragon 845 doesn't throttle every bit heavily, so information technology produces amend long term performance.

The results from both the CPU, GPU and real-world tests are quite interesting. For the virtually part, the Exynos 9810 produces disappointing performance that either narrowly beats or merely equals the Snapdragon 835, Qualcomm's terminal-generation silicon. Information technology'south clear that the Snapdragon 845 variant of the Milky way S9+ is the i to get if possible, equally it produces performance more than in line with what we'd expect from a 2022 SoC, at least going on other reviews that have tested this model.

Lower than expected functioning poses an interesting question as to what Samsung did with the Exynos 9810 in the Milky way S9+. Luckily, the folks at AnandTech have dug into the event, uncovering by and large software and firmware related bug with the Exynos model. They have some great analysis on the thing that you lot should read if you are interested, merely information technology can exist summarized equally 2 major problems.

Samsung uses a hot-plugging machinery for thread migrations between cores, which is inefficient, and the scheduler is tuned such that the CPU takes a long time to achieve its maximum frequency. Ideally, the CPU reaches height performance as quickly equally possible, completes the chore in a shorter catamenia of time, so shuts off to conserve power. The Exynos 9810 in the Milky way S9+ appears to slowly ramp up to its maximum frequency, causing information technology to underwhelm in brusque workloads.

In terms of storage functioning, the Galaxy S9+ performs well although it doesn't set new records for NAND performance and can't match the latest Huawei devices. Sequential operation is strong with improvements to both reads and writes compared to the Galaxy S8+, nonetheless random performance remains a calendar week indicate with adequately average speeds for a high-end Android smartphone.